We the Subjects

We are corporate property owned by the Federal Reserve Bank. This includes all of our assets. Our Birth Certificate, a bank note, is held in the archives of the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). This, of course, was done without our consent.

Our names on our Birth Certificates, as registered, are presented in block-capitalized format to signify a corporation such as a State, Trust, Nation, C-Corp, or LLC. To “register” anything is to put it in the Sea Jurisdiction, which is the jurisdiction of the corporate government. Likewise, to “record” anything is to put it in the Land Jurisdiction. 

This Birth Certificate serves two functions: as an Insurance Indemnity Receipt and a Bond. The value given to it is derived from the average earnings of a lifetime of labor to which they Bond your Estate for that amount. The benefit to the state is one of trading on that Estate name, and using the money you spend on taxes to take out a life insurance policy on you that the state will then collect when you die. 

This all began with the passage of the 14thAmendment adopted on July 9, 1868 and declared ratified July 28, 1868.  

Following the Civil War, during the reconstruction period, much issue was given to the legislation that would grant equal protection of the laws to former slaves. This, of course, ultimately became a deceptive act of increasing the scale of control to include all citizens born from then on (without their consent), as well as the recently naturalized inhabitants of America (of which consent would be willing in order to free them from their prior existence as slaves). 

What, in this specific instance, is a “citizen”?

According to Black’s Law Dictionary (Sixth Edition), “Citizens are members of a political community who, in their associated capacity, have established or submitted themselves to the dominion of a government for the promotion of their general welfare and the protection of their individual as well as collective rights. (Herriot vs City of Seattle, 81 Wash.2d. 48, 500 P.2d. 101, 109)”

Consider that in order for a government to grab and maintain power, or have a collective base from which power is derived and ultimately extorted from, that government must have “citizens” or, more appropriately, “subjects”. 

Clearly a baby would not have the ability to submit themselves to the dominion of the government, so an act of deceit was required to establish this relationship, an act that is clearly illegal and unconstitutional. 

For adults to fall within the jurisdiction of the Federal Government, voting restrictions were enacted in Section 2 of the 14thAmendment that would require males 21 years of age or older to become citizens in order to participate in Federal and State elections. 

From there, men willingly claiming U.S. citizenship on their voter’s registration card were unwittingly brought in as subjects of the Federal Government. 

To avoid attaching themselves to this same fate, Congress enacted a loophole for themselves: 15 States at Large, Chapter 249 (Section 1), enacted July 27, 1868. This was one day prior to when the 14thAmendment was declared ratified. Evidence of this statue is rarely found as it was never intended to be publicly acknowledged. It is important to note that is has never been repealed. The text follows:

Whereas the rights of expatriation is a natural and inherent  right of all people, indispensable to the enjoyment of the rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness;  and whereas in the recognition of this principle this government has freely received emigrants from all nations, and invested them with the rights of citizenship; and whereas  it is claimed that such American citizens,  with their descendants,  are subjects of foreign states,  owing allegiance to the governments thereof;  and whereas it is necessary to the maintenance of public peace that this claim of foreign  allegiance should be promptly   and  finally disavowed: Therefore, 

Be it enacted by the Senate and the House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That any declaration, instruction, opinion, order, or decision, of any officers of this government which denies, restricts, impairs or questions the rights of expatriation, is hereby declared inconsistent with the fundamental principles of this government.  

This essentially states that anyone who wishes to expatriate, or renounce their U.S. citizenship, may do so by inherent right and he cannot be denied this right. This exemption could then be hidden from general view while the promotion of citizenship was thrust to the front of public discourse through media and ultimately indoctrination through the public schools. 

Today, this is a promotion of being forced to obey the millions of codes, statues, and laws; exacting fines for breaking these laws; and extracting license fees and taxes upon penalty of seizure or jail. 

Southerners who had participated in the rebellion were excluded intentionally so that the Freemans Bureau could pursue punishing fines and sanctions against them that would enable the Federal Government to present a “solution” to them in the form of the 15thAmendment, further increasing the scale of control by forcing them to swear an allegiance to the United States and thus become a “citizen of the United States”. 

Let us now turn to Section 4 of the 14thAmendment. 

The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.

[emphasis added]

The first part of Section 4 states that the debts incurred by the U.S. government were not to be questioned and that the enforcers whom the Government hired to quell insurrection would be paid by the Government. Where was this money to come from? From its newly acquired citizens – We the Subjects. 

This constitutional amendment gives permission for the Federal Government to essentially hire any combination of private law enforcement institutions that they so choose to control us, such as the CIA, FBI, BATF, and DEA (just to name a few), to which we are obligated to pay for with the money earned by our labor; and that no question could ever be brought to court about the constitutionality of these actions. 

These are acts of treachery that persist to this day. 

Works Cited 

Sibley, George. The Day Our Country Was Stolen. L. C. Lyon

Riezinger, Anna Maria. Taking Back America. Victurus Libertas VL

2 thoughts on “We the Subjects

  1. you do some great work to raise awareness. i enjoy your articles but i have a question; if the act of 1871 was the second bancruptcy of the US then why did it take so long for it to be taken into receivership by FDR in 1933? are the members of congress a different class of citizen? what is meant by the term, non-resident alien?


    1. Hi Joe! Thank you for your compliment! Let me see if I can answer some of your questions.

      In regards to FDR, I am not sure time was so much of an issue as “states of war” and “states of emergency” were continually declared by Presidents and Congress to retain control of all assets that belonged to the States & State Citizens. Because of this, all assets were in possession of the United States of America, Inc. when it declared bankruptcy in 1933. Leading up to that bankruptcy was the Federal Reserve printing money like crazy resulting in risky investments being made by comfortable citizens looking for a quick return and when they pulled the plug in 1929 by cutting off the money supply, the bankers were positioned to benefit from the fallout. Everything that happened in 1933 was a monumental fraud.

      As for members of congress being a different class of citizen: I am not entirely aware of that beyond their ability to opt-out of citizenship by their own efforts (“15 States at Large”, for example); however, their legal ability to legislate for their benefit alone implies that they could be considered a different class of citizen just by the nature that they can create laws and we cannot.

      As for a formal definition of non-resident alien, I found this: “a foreigner who does not possess a green card and who has not been present in the United States for more than a certain number of days over a period of time”.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s